AI visibility in Clay
Clay thinks in tables — a row per company, a column per fact. AI visibility fits that shape perfectly: for every brand in your table, what does ChatGPT say about it, and who gets cited when a buyer asks the category question? AgentGEO answers that per row, through Clay's HTTP API enrichment. It's a distinctly go-to-market read on GEO data: agencies use it to find prospects who are invisible in AI answers (and pitch them exactly that), competitive teams use it to grid a whole category. No AgentGEO-branded Clay integration exists — the HTTP API column and one REST endpoint are the entire, honest story.
Read this page with an AI
Each enriched row returns the engine's verbatim answerText plus structured sources[] — so downstream columns can extract "was the company mentioned", "was its domain cited", or "which competitors appear" with Clay's own formulas and AI columns doing the parsing.
Get a free AI-visibility audit → · Read the docs → — No card, no account.
Get my free auditConnect AgentGEO to Clay
Add an HTTP API enrichment column: method POST, endpoint https://api.agentgeo.org/v1/fetches, an Authorization: Bearer ag_live_... header, and a body that merges your row fields into the query:
{
"query": "best {{category}} tools",
"surfaces": ["chatgpt"]
}Keep it to one surface per column — a row-level enrichment should return in seconds where possible, and the API can hold a slow multi-surface call up to 180 seconds. Want Perplexity too? Add a second column with "surfaces": ["perplexity"]; Clay runs them independently, and each delivered record costs one credit (failed records cost zero). Map response fields into follow-up columns — answers[0].answerText for the text, answers[0].sources for citations.
Point a Clay AI column at the enriched answerText with a prompt like "Is {{company}} mentioned? Answer yes/no and quote the sentence." AgentGEO deliberately returns raw records with no scores — the mention check, the sentiment read, the ranking are yours to compute, and inside Clay that's one more column.
Tables worth building
- Prospect qualifier for GEO services. Rows = target accounts; columns = whether each is mentioned in ChatGPT and Perplexity for its category query. The "no" rows are your pitch list, with the receipts attached.
- Category share-of-voice grid. Rows = the queries buyers actually ask; columns = one engine each. Formulas mark which competitors' domains appear in
sources[]— a visibility matrix you own. - Competitor citation sources. Extract the domains each engine cites for your category and enrich those — the publications worth pitching are the ones the engines already trust.
- Account-research snippets. A column of "what does ChatGPT say about {{company}}" verbatim answers, feeding outreach personalization that quotes the machine.
More integrations
Table-shaped elsewhere too: Airtable and Google Sheets run the same contract on a cadence. For workflow-shaped monitoring, start with n8n. See all integrations.
Run the category audit before you build the table: Get a free audit → · Docs →
Get my free audit